How the law is perceived in the 20 th century

Authors

  • Jarmila Chovancová Faculty of Law, Comenius University in Bratislava, Slovakia.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.14595/PES/03/004

Abstract

In this essay the author reflects connection between iusnaturalism and positivism. Dominant discussion is understanding law and morality which represents neverending story. The article analyzes positive law in  20th century represented by H.L. A Hart and natural law development by L.L. Fuller and R. Alexy. Twentieth century can be called a period during which natural law has been shifted towards more positivism within the natural law. Jural positivism can be understood as a doctrine based on the Bentham´s utilitarism which didn´t accept other normative systems to be involved into concept of law. Prominent representatives of this theory have completely excluded moral content of the legal standards and they consider these to be irrelevant for the validity of the law. According to them evaluating standards through moral criteria is not appropriate because this brings chaos into the jural thinking.

Methodology: This essay using from methodology methods of comparation, especially positive law represented by H.L.A. Hart and natural law represented by LL.Fuller, R. Alexy in the20th century and also analyzing connection between law and morality.

References

ALEXY, R.: Theorie der grundrechtes. 2. Frankfurt am Main, 1994

ALEXY, R.: Begriff und Gehtung des Rechts. 2. Freiburg – München, 1994

ARISTOTELES. Rétorika. Praha, 1999

Cicero: O povinnostech. Praha, 1970

DWORKIN, R.: Když se práva berou vážně. Praha, 2001

DWORKIN, R.: Law´s Empire. Cambridge, 1986

FINNIS, J.: Natural Law and Natural Rigts. Oxford, 1980

FULLER, L. L.: Positivism and Fidelity to Law. Harward, Law Review 71, 1958

FULLER, L. L.: Morálka práva. Praha, 1998

HART, H. L. A.: Pojem práva. Praha, 2004

HART, H. L. A.: Recht and Moral. Göttingen, 1978

HART, H. L. A.: Law in the Perspectives of Philosophy. New York University, 1976

HAYEK, F. A. von: The Road to Serfdom. London, 1944

HOBBES, T.: De cive. Výbor z díla. Praha, 1988

HUSTER, S.: Rechte und Ziele. Berlin, 1993

CHOVANCOVÁ, J.: Vízia filozofie v treťom tisícročí a základné zásady právneho myslenia. Bratislava, 2012

CHOVANCOVÁ, J.: Antológia z politickej a právnej filozofie. Bratislava, 2009

KANT, I.: Základy metafyziky mravů. Praha, 1976

KAUFFMAN, H.: Analogia un Natur der Sache. Heidelberg, 1982

KELSEN, H.: Was ist Gerechtigheit. Stuttgard, 2000

KELSEN, H.: Recht und Logik. Wien, 1965

KLOBOUCH, J.: Pluralistické výklady spravedlnosti. Právník, č. 6, Praha, 1995

KNAPP, V.: Teória práva. Praha, 1995

KOTARBINSKI, T.: Kurs logiki dla prawnikow. Warszawa, 1975

LEVIN, J.: How Judges Reason. New York, 1992

RADBRUCH, G.: Zákonné bezprávie a nezákonné právo. Praha, 2011

ŠMID, J.: L. L. Fuller. Distance Revue pro kritické myšlení. Praha, 2007

VALENT, T. – Chovancová, J. a kol.: Texty z dejín právnej filozofie. Bratislava, 2012

WINTR, J.: Charakteristické princípy práva a právních odvetví. Praha, 2002

WINTR, J.: Říše princípů. Praha, 2006

Downloads

Published

2016-07-07